« My dad's view | Main | Cat in cupboard »

February 08, 2006

major prize

Here is the prize awarded to the members of the second place team at the pool league. A nice little shot glass. Someone won a pool cue! (Yes, deservedly, but still. ;))


Posted by John at February 8, 2006 02:46 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.greyfence.com/blog/mt-tb.cgi/120

Comments

bravissima Kerry on your new cue! Whee!! I was just reading your entry re winning it. I guess you could always share custody with that friend of yours who came in second place... etc. You know.

The trophy depicted above is a definite bummer though. It starts with one widget like this in your place and pretty soon you can't take one step in any direction without knocking your front teeth in some bibelot or other.

Posted by: Elise at February 8, 2006 03:12 PM

Hey! I gave you props on 'shoulda gotta cue' in my blog! :)

That's a pretty nice cup though!

Posted by: kerry at February 8, 2006 03:12 PM

>> Hey! I gave you props on 'shoulda gotta cue' in my blog!

You did mention me ... thanks for your outrage on my behalf. ;) The guy who got it deserved it just as much as I did so it's all good. And I'm glad they gave us shotglasses rather than some trophy or something else of no utility that I'd have to keep around!

Posted by: John at February 8, 2006 03:23 PM

>> The trophy depicted above is a definite bummer though.

The first place team got beer glasses. Now *that* I really would use!

(btw, I had to look up 'bibelot' ... good word!)

Posted by: John at February 8, 2006 03:26 PM

Thanks Elise! (notice we posted at the exact same time? ha! Great minds and all that...) ;)

I dunno John, it seems to me that you should have received that cue considering all the work you did, even Mike and Russell said so.

Share custody of my cue? No way! He wouldn't even TOUCH it last night! ...literally squirmed away from it... squirmed!

Posted by: kerry at February 8, 2006 03:34 PM

...I guess that's why they only had 3 pool cues instead of the promised 8. They had to buy all that pewter.

Posted by: kerry at February 8, 2006 03:35 PM

squirming from the cue, huh? hmm. let me see here...

Posted by: Elise at February 8, 2006 03:35 PM

No joke, he squirmed AND skrinched his eyes AND stepped back AND said in no uncertain terms "I'm not touching your stick"! LOL :)

Posted by: kerry at February 8, 2006 03:37 PM

squirmed?

Posted by: John at February 8, 2006 03:44 PM

huh. next time you see him, purely as a science project it could be interesting to test his reaction by pointing as some random other guy across the room and saying something like, "Earlier I heard that guy say he wouldn't mind trying your cue."

Posted by: Elise at February 8, 2006 03:47 PM

You SO squirmed! It was the most bizarre reaction to a pool cue I've ever seen. :)

Elise, don't give me any ideas. I'm going to start pointing at random ANYTHING and saying that now. lol

Posted by: kerry at February 8, 2006 03:57 PM

alternatively, you could invite him to the next meeting of the knitting group and see how he feels about knitting needles.

Posted by: Elise at February 8, 2006 04:07 PM

oops! ok well in my defense here, i didn't realize we were talking about our host here. although now that i do, what's up with that reaction? and what about chopsticks, any issues with those?

Posted by: Elise at February 8, 2006 04:10 PM

Funny you mention the knitting group. He has actually demonstrated a rather violent aversion to this as well.

maybe its just polished sticks in general he doesn't like? hmmm...

Posted by: kerry at February 8, 2006 04:11 PM

hockey sticks?

Posted by: kerry at February 8, 2006 04:11 PM

OK, I was jealous! I admit it! Couldn't you tell I was fighting back tears? The hurt! The pain!


Thanks very much for forcing me to relive it...


*sniff*

Posted by: John at February 8, 2006 04:20 PM

anyhow. i don't wanna break your eharts, guys, but a girlfriend and i are going to swiss chalet after work today. the last time i visited the chalet, i was on my first day at a new job in old montreal (15 years ago) with only half an hour for lunch.

i hear their gravy's amazing. wish me luck!

Posted by: Elise at February 8, 2006 04:23 PM

You mean you were in Montreal and selected a Swish Chalet over St. Huberts? Mon Dieu! ;)

ok ok, you can touch the stick next time. sheesh.

Posted by: kerry at February 8, 2006 04:32 PM

...nice shot of that shot glass, btw. ;)

Posted by: kerry at February 8, 2006 04:37 PM

I always skip the gravy, silly me.

The Yonge St Swiss Chalet by Gerrard?

Posted by: John at February 8, 2006 04:40 PM

>> ok ok, you can touch the stick next time. sheesh.

Hey, I don't need any pity touching. ;)

Posted by: John at February 8, 2006 04:40 PM

I don't usually have the gravy either actually, but most people say they love it.

Posted by: kerry at February 8, 2006 04:41 PM

pity shmity

Posted by: kerry at February 8, 2006 04:42 PM

oh yes, it's a nice shot. and if you get tired of having it around you can try removing that metallic badge thing and wearing it on your lapel, pass yourself off as an officer of the peace.

Posted by: Elise at February 8, 2006 04:42 PM

i'm not sure which chalet location we're going to. (i wonder if each has a different roof top colour, for variety?)

Kerry, your mention of Saint-Hubert just got me compeltely fixated on THAT gravy. Now that was some serious gravy right there. I can't imagine the Chalet gravy coming anywhere close now.

Posted by: Elise at February 8, 2006 04:45 PM

You say you SKIP the gravy or you SIP the gravy?

Posted by: Elise at February 8, 2006 04:47 PM

LOL


SKIP


Sorry for the confusion. ;)

Posted by: John at February 8, 2006 04:54 PM

Frankly I prefer the SH's gravy.

When my mother is in Quebec she pronounces SH's with a french accent, but when she's in Ontario its gone. ...she doesn't speak a word of french.

Posted by: kerry at February 8, 2006 04:55 PM

>> ...nice shot of that shot glass, btw. ;)

Thanks. I think having Fanny Hill in the background adds something special to the shot...

Posted by: John at February 8, 2006 04:55 PM

oh i know, that gravy. here in ontario we're fond of our superb coffee? there they have superb gravy.

Posted by: Elise at February 8, 2006 04:56 PM

Oh, do enjoy SC and they're gravy!

Posted by: John at February 8, 2006 04:58 PM

'their' not 'they're'


(stupid english language)

Posted by: John at February 8, 2006 04:59 PM

(thus the sipping confusion before i suppose.)

but this is profound communication we've gotten into, isn't it. deep, deep secrets being shared here today. i don't know about you but i'm exhausted!

Posted by: Elise at February 8, 2006 05:03 PM

me too, a little. lol

Posted by: kerry at February 8, 2006 05:10 PM

a word on the SC sauce...

After dipping my first fry in there I thought, "What the...!" No BBQ taste that I could detect, in fact, no specialness factor at all! But once I got over that admittedly primitive reaction (by bite number 2) and got back into a more forgiving, "There's a crack in everything that's how the light gets in" spirit, I got a grip. You know, we all have our challenges. And for the Chalet, well, that means finding a way to pack some zip into their mushy brown goo somehow.

And, as inevitably happens whenever you scrutinize a problem closely enough, pretty soon you realize that there are other, more pressing concerns out there.

Sure enough: our waitress showed, up and it was time to choose dessert.

Posted by: Elise at February 9, 2006 09:02 AM

yeah, the gravy is just 'whatever'. Although the rib sauce is good!

Posted by: kerry at February 9, 2006 10:33 AM

I never realized gravy could be such a life affecting experience, wow.

Posted by: John at February 9, 2006 10:36 AM

I know! I have a problem identifying what is a big issue and what is a normal size issue. but wasn't it Eisnstein who said, "We must live life as if everything is a miracle or nothing is a miracle"?

Posted by: Elise at February 9, 2006 11:03 AM

in any event, i looked up this Fanny Hill reference, and now I'm determined to find a copy of the sinful journals! It'll be a nice, classic change from my copy of "100 ways to drive a man crazy" which I have made such extensive use of already, you know?

Posted by: Elise at February 9, 2006 11:16 AM

I just finished reading 'A Field Guide to the Urban Hipster' by Josh Aiello.

...fun to read a book about one's self. ;)

Posted by: kerry at February 9, 2006 11:40 AM

>> "100 ways to drive a man crazy"

There have been only 100?

I can swap the books with you. ;)

Posted by: John at February 9, 2006 11:59 AM

hooonnnn... never heard of it, will look up!

Posted by: Elise at February 9, 2006 11:59 AM

>> 'A Field Guide to the Urban Hipster'

Aren't 'field' and 'urban' mutually exclusive?

Posted by: John at February 9, 2006 11:59 AM

JOSH AIELLO excels at drinking coffee and has been known to read the New York Times Magazine with one hand while processing 401(k) rollover requests with the other.

I think i'm... in love!

Posted by: Elise at February 9, 2006 12:02 PM

The full title, John, is "100 ways to drive a man crazy in bed" (I'm translating loosely as this slim tome is in French.) And you're right; there are certainly millions of ways to please a man. But if my impression is correct, one's memory seems able to retain only something like... 3 of them. So bigger books on the topic would not only serve to ruin one's wrists.

Posted by: Elise at February 9, 2006 12:08 PM

Elise, you are truely a woman of wisdom! ;)

Posted by: kerry at February 9, 2006 12:10 PM

("would serve no other purpose than to ruin one's wrists" is what i mean to say. sorry about the typos. it's the unnervment.)

Posted by: Elise at February 9, 2006 12:10 PM

why, Kerry, thank you darling! shall we take a stroll up Yonge street one of these days and go searching for those delightful cupcakes, while sharing our innerdeepest fears and hopes? Oh, we could so recline in the park under a tree afterwards and together draw a mental portrait of the man of our collective dreams.

(gosh i'm sooooo sorry. i think i've got a really, really bad case of the fanny hills.)

Posted by: Elise at February 9, 2006 12:23 PM

NO man will be able to live up to the collective dreams of two women, heh.

Posted by: John at February 9, 2006 12:28 PM

well, huh! what are you tryin' to say? that we should stop searching and be content with, you know, like, YOU or something?

Posted by: Elise at February 9, 2006 12:30 PM

*gasp* ...BURN! lol ;)

Posted by: kerry at February 9, 2006 12:39 PM

That demands a very snappy comeback but ... I got nothing. Where's Jon Stewart when you need him?!


Posted by: John at February 9, 2006 12:48 PM

oh come on! you know i'm kidding, right? kerry and i simply adore you. and we'd be happy as all get out with only you in our lives full time. but you know how it is: we will if you will, Mister Modelizer!

Posted by: Elise at February 9, 2006 12:55 PM

Doesn't every guy go through a model phase?

Posted by: John at February 9, 2006 01:06 PM

d'you mean when they're like 14? i think that might be true.

Posted by: Elise at February 9, 2006 02:04 PM

Being adolescent lasts well past his 30s for a man so that's about right.

Posted by: John at February 9, 2006 02:18 PM

er... i'm not so sure about calculating human phases in dog years...

Posted by: Elise at February 9, 2006 02:23 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)